U.S. President Donald Trump pauses as he finishes speaking during a televised address on the conflict in the Middle East from the Cross Hall of the White House in Washington on April 1. President Trump made his case for attacking Iran in his first nationwide address more than a month into the war, insisting the United States was close to victory as his approval rating sinks. [AFP/YONHAP]
U.S. President Donald Trump said in a national address that the United States would deliver “extremely powerful strikes” against Iran within the next two to three weeks and that “we will bring them back to the Stone Age.” On the Strait of Hormuz, he added that countries dependent on the route will have to resolve it themselves.
The remarks have dampened expectations for a near-term end to the conflict and raised concerns that tensions will escalate further. An energy crisis and supply chain disruption are likely to intensify. Trump’s statement that affected countries should handle the issue of the strait on their own places a significant burden on Korea. If the United States reduces its direct involvement, it may instead increase pressure on partner countries to contribute militarily. Iran could also demand substantial transit fees, further complicating the situation.
The government must prepare for all possible scenarios. Close communication and coordination with countries facing similar risks will be essential. Particularly notable was Trump’s expression of dissatisfaction with Korea during an Easter luncheon before the address. He said Korea “was not helpful” despite the United States stationing 45,000 troops “in a dangerous place, right next to nuclear forces,” signaling potential friction in bilateral relations.
Regardless of how the conflict develops, Korea faces a difficult path ahead. Managing immediate energy supply challenges will not be easy. At the same time, Seoul may be confronted with what could be interpreted as a political and security “bill” from the Trump administration. Such demands may be linked to broader economic and security interests, including the possible redeployment of U.S. air defense assets currently positioned in the Middle East. This could directly affect Korea’s security posture and alliance arrangements.
A careful and strategic response is required. Strengthening communication with the United States while minimizing potential burdens should be a priority. However, given recent signs of discord between the two governments, concerns remain about whether communication channels are functioning effectively and whether mutual trust has been sufficiently established. The government should mobilize all available diplomatic networks to enhance engagement with the Trump administration and avoid unnecessary disadvantages. The risks extend beyond the economy and may spread across security and foreign policy as well.
This article was originally written in Korean and translated by a bilingual reporter with the help of generative AI tools. It was then edited by a native English-speaking editor. All AI-assisted translations are reviewed and refined by our newsroom.
댓글
0