Supreme Court
Major Decisions
‘Shadow Docket’ Origins
Birthright Citizenship
‘Conversion Therapy’ Ruling
Tariffs Struck Down
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.
Supported by
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Supreme Court Appears Skeptical of Falun Gong Lawsuit Against Tech Company
The court’s decision could have broader implications for lawsuits seeking to hold companies liable for international human rights abuses.
Listen
· 6:03 min
Share full article
Members of Falun Gong during a protest meditation in Manhattan in 2024. The Chinese government has banned the group.
Credit...
Jonah Markowitz for The New York Times
By
Abbie VanSickle
Reporting from Washington
April 28, 2026,
3:05 p.m. ET
See more of our coverage in your search results.
Encuentra más de nuestra cobertura en los resultados de búsqueda.
Add The New York Times on Google
Agrega The New York Times en Google
A majority of the Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared skeptical of a lawsuit by Falun Gong members who claim that an American tech company helped the Chinese government to target them for torture.
The lawsuit asserts that Cisco Systems Inc. helped the Chinese government create an internet censorship program, known as the Golden Shield, that enabled the government to surveil and harm members of the spiritual movement, which is banned in China.
At issue before the Supreme Court is whether American courts can judge such disputes. During oral arguments on Tuesday, several of the court’s conservatives raised concerns about allowing the lawsuit to proceed, suggesting that the executive branch and Congress, not the courts, were best equipped to handle allegations of human rights abuses in other countries.
“I’m concerned at a separation-of-powers level,” said Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, adding that he worried that allowing such lawsuits might give Congress less of an incentive to take action.
It was not clear whether the conservative justices were in complete agreement about how to treat the issue, but several expressed concerns that lower courts had allowed too many similar cases that aim to hold companies and people responsible for human rights abuses abroad.
The case before the court,
Cisco Systems Inc. v. Doe
, was
initially filed
in 2011. It came to the Supreme Court after a panel of federal judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
agreed in July 2023
that the lawsuit could continue, finding that the Falun Gong members had met a legal threshold to press their claims.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and
log into
your Times account, or
subscribe
for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber?
Log in
.
Want all of The Times?
Subscribe
.
Related Content
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
댓글
0