[Hwang Misun's Crisis Escape – Season7] Why Do Organizations Slow Down ...

Decision-Making Flow Gets Blocked at the Exit

[Image credit: AI-generated by the author]

[By Hwang Misun, Columnist, Korea Lecturer News] When a crisis occurs, an organization should become faster. But in reality, the opposite often happens. More meetings are held than usual, more reports are submitted, and more people offer their opinions. Yet the actual decision is delayed.

“I’ll check on it.”

“I’ll report it to the higher-ups.”

“I’ll discuss it with the related departments.”

There is more talking, but no conclusion. The reason organizations slow down during a crisis is not simply a lack of people. It is because the flow of decision-making gets blocked at the exit.

Under normal circumstances, organizations move with a certain amount of flexibility. There is time, there are procedures, and there is room to wait. But a crisis is different. Information rushes in all at once. Problems occur on the ground, customers demand answers, and internally, people begin to question who is responsible. At that moment, what is needed is not more information, but a decision-making structure that can judge quickly and act immediately.

The problem is that most organizations repeat their normal procedures even during a crisis. The staff member reports to the team leader, the team leader reports to the department head, and the department head consults with other departments again. Reports move upward, and decisions must come back downward. But the more middle stages there are, the slower the flow becomes.

It is like people crowding into a narrow exit. The blockage does not happen only because there are too many people. A bottleneck forms when people cannot move in the same direction, hesitate, and watch one another. Organizations are the same. When information comes in but decisions cannot get out, the crisis grows.

What especially slows organizations down during a crisis is “responsibility-avoiding confirmation.”

“Can I make this decision?”

“Who will be responsible if something goes wrong?”

“I’ll check a bit more before moving forward.”

These words may sound cautious, but sometimes they make the crisis worse. If everyone repeats confirmation at the very moment a decision must be made, the organization cannot move. In crisis response, a late decision can sometimes be more dangerous than a wrong decision.

Of course, fast decisions do not mean reckless decisions. What matters is deciding in advance who can make which decisions, when, and to what extent. When authority is unclear, every decision moves upward during a crisis. If even small judgments are concentrated at the top, the exit of decision-making quickly becomes blocked.

A strong organization does not ask during a crisis:

“Who should make this decision?”

It already knows.

“How far should this be reported?”

It is already defined.

“Can we act now?”

There is already a standard.

Organizations with strong crisis response are not strong only because their people are exceptional. They are strong because the flow of decisions is simple. Matters that can be judged on-site are handled on-site, and matters requiring higher-level decisions are quickly separated. They reduce reporting for the sake of reporting and prioritize judgment for action.

[Image credit: AI-generated by the author]

The reason organizations slow down during a crisis is not because they lack ability. It is because the exit for decisions is too narrow. Information rushes in, but authority is not distributed, responsibility is unclear, and procedures are complicated. As a result, the organization sees the crisis but cannot move.

A crisis reveals the true structure of an organization. Reporting systems, approval procedures, and responsibility structures that seemed fine in ordinary times can become bottlenecks in a crisis.

For an organization to move faster during a crisis, it must change the question.

Not, “Who reported this?”

But, “Who can make the decision?”

The core of crisis response is not more meetings.

It is a structure that prevents decisions from getting blocked.

The speed of an organization is revealed in a crisis.

And that speed is ultimately determined at the exit of decision-making.

Columnist Profile

Hwang Misun is a disaster safety instructor who has conducted on-site safety education for citizens and students. Based on repeated observations of “stoppages” and “congestion” in real training environments, she interprets disasters not as individual failures but as structural and spatial problems. Her work analyzes everyday risk in hospitals, schools, public transportation, and performance venues through the lens of movement flow, bottlenecks, guidance systems, and exit functionality. She is currently conducting research on evacuation structures using microscopic pedestrian simulation.

주요

기사

황미선 칼럼니스트