Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.
Supported by
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
A.I. ‘Hallucinations’ Created Errors in Court Filing, Top Law Firm Says
Sullivan & Cromwell apologized for submitting a court document that had fake citations created by artificial intelligence.
Listen
· 3:48 min
Share full article
Lawyers for Sullivan & Cromwell apologized for submitting a court filing that had fake citations created by artificial intelligence.
Credit...
John Taggart for The New York Times
By
Santul Nerkar
April 21, 2026,
6:39 p.m. ET
See more of our coverage in your search results.
Encuentra más de nuestra cobertura en los resultados de búsqueda.
Add The New York Times on Google
Agrega The New York Times en Google
An elite Wall Street law firm has apologized to a federal judge for submitting a court filing replete with errors created by artificial intelligence, including “hallucinations” that fabricated case citations.
The A.I.-generated errors came in a recent motion in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan and were discovered by lawyers from an opposing firm, Andrew Dietderich, a partner at Sullivan & Cromwell, wrote in a letter to Judge Martin Glenn on April 18.
“We deeply regret that this has occurred,” Mr. Dietderich wrote.
The firm provided a ledger of the errors, which spanned three pages and totaled around three dozen. A number of them involved the citation of seemingly imagined passages from real cases.
Sullivan & Cromwell is one of the oldest and most prestigious law firms in the country. It is representing President Trump in several appeals, including his criminal conviction in 2024 in a case that stemmed from a
hush-money payment to a porn star
. Jay Clayton, now the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, was of counsel and formerly a partner at the firm.
The apology revealed the latest embarrassing blunder for lawyers found to have used A.I. in crafting erroneous arguments. The legal profession is undergoing a reckoning over the growing and widespread use of A.I., which is luring lawyers dealing with voluminous research even as it has a propensity to spit out legal falsehoods.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and
log into
your Times account, or
subscribe
for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber?
Log in
.
Want all of The Times?
Subscribe
.
Related Content
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
댓글
0