본문 바로가기
사회

A.I. ‘Hallucinations’ Created Errors in Court Filing, Top Law Firm Say...

Sullivan & Cromwell apologized for submitting a court document that had fake citations created by artificial intelligence. An elite Wall Street law firm has apologized to a federal judge for...

A.I. ‘Hallucinations’ Created Errors in Court Filing, Top Law Firm Say...

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.

Supported by

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

A.I. ‘Hallucinations’ Created Errors in Court Filing, Top Law Firm Says

Sullivan & Cromwell apologized for submitting a court document that had fake citations created by artificial intelligence.

Listen

· 3:48 min

Share full article

Lawyers for Sullivan & Cromwell apologized for submitting a court filing that had fake citations created by artificial intelligence.

Credit...

John Taggart for The New York Times

By

Santul Nerkar

April 21, 2026,

6:39 p.m. ET

See more of our coverage in your search results.

Encuentra más de nuestra cobertura en los resultados de búsqueda.

Add The New York Times on Google

Agrega The New York Times en Google

An elite Wall Street law firm has apologized to a federal judge for submitting a court filing replete with errors created by artificial intelligence, including “hallucinations” that fabricated case citations.

The A.I.-generated errors came in a recent motion in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan and were discovered by lawyers from an opposing firm, Andrew Dietderich, a partner at Sullivan & Cromwell, wrote in a letter to Judge Martin Glenn on April 18.

“We deeply regret that this has occurred,” Mr. Dietderich wrote.

The firm provided a ledger of the errors, which spanned three pages and totaled around three dozen. A number of them involved the citation of seemingly imagined passages from real cases.

Sullivan & Cromwell is one of the oldest and most prestigious law firms in the country. It is representing President Trump in several appeals, including his criminal conviction in 2024 in a case that stemmed from a

hush-money payment to a porn star

. Jay Clayton, now the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, was of counsel and formerly a partner at the firm.

The apology revealed the latest embarrassing blunder for lawyers found to have used A.I. in crafting erroneous arguments. The legal profession is undergoing a reckoning over the growing and widespread use of A.I., which is luring lawyers dealing with voluminous research even as it has a propensity to spit out legal falsehoods.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and

log into

your Times account, or

subscribe

for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?

Log in

.

Want all of The Times?

Subscribe

.

Related Content

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

이 기사 공유하기
페이스북X

이 기사를 추천합니다

i

댓글

0

후 댓글을 작성할 수 있습니다.

아직 댓글이 없습니다 이 기사에 첫 의견을 남겨보세요.

댓글 수정