Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.
Newsletter
Ross Douthat
Opinion
Does Israel Want to Be Saudi Arabia?
April 21, 2026,
5:05 p.m. ET
Credit...
Illustration The New York Times; source image by Wong Yu Liang, via Getty Images
Share full article
By
Ross Douthat
Opinion Columnist
See more of our coverage in your search results.
Encuentra más de nuestra cobertura en los resultados de búsqueda.
Add The New York Times on Google
Agrega The New York Times en Google
I have
written
repeatedly
about why I think the United States can accept some degree of geopolitical embarrassment as the price of ending our war with Iran, without that embarrassment being an era-defining debacle or inflection point.
A different question, though, is whether this war will be remembered as an inflection point for Israel in its relationship with the United States.
For now, the war seems to have
accelerated
the broad anti-Israel shift in American public opinion, sharpest among Democrats but increasingly important among young Republicans as well, while also pushing critiques of Israel in a more radical direction — toward a deeper anti-Zionism, a more conspiratorial world picture and an
assertion of moral equivalence
between the Israeli government and Hamas.
I don’t share any of those radical critiques, but I still find myself participating in the larger shift. Because I thought the Gaza war
became unjust
and because I think the American war with Iran was a bad idea that wouldn’t have been embraced without strong encouragement from Benjamin Netanyahu, I am more personally skeptical of the American-Israeli relationship that at any point I can recall.
That skepticism puts me in a somewhat similar place to center-left Democrats like Matthew Yglesias, who has been having a running argument with pro-Israel writers about
whether Israeli conduct matters much
to the political trend described above, or whether the storm around Israel is an inevitable result of larger forces — left-wing identitarianism, right-wing nationalism, digital conditions — that have converged to make anti-Zionism bigger and bring antisemitism back.
It’s a complicated debate because Yglesias’s interlocutors are correct that much of the shift is overdetermined. On the left, even a liberal Zionism just doesn’t fit into the paradigms of contemporary progressivism, and Israel is both an exemplar of nationalist and religious values that left-wingers increasingly reject and a place where American progressives can
project critiques
of Manifest Destiny and “settler colonialism” that otherwise feel purely antiquarian.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and
log into
your Times account, or
subscribe
for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber?
Log in
.
Want all of The Times?
Subscribe
.
Related Content
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
댓글
0